Throwback Thursday is a weekly feature hosted by Tenacious Reader to highlight books from the past. It can honestly be anything as long as its not a book that is a current release. Maybe its a book that I read and reviewed and just want to highlight, maybe its a book I read before I started reviewing or maybe its a book that has a sequel coming out soon or maybe its a backlist book from my TBR that I just want to revisit and decide if I will make the time to read. Pretty much, anything goes.
I “discovered” Stephen King in my teens, starting with Firestarter. While that one didn’t do much for me, I quickly moved onto Cujo and that one scared the fool out of me. From that point onward, I was hooked and I’ve been an avid fan of King ever since.
Somewhere along the way, I read Pet Sematary. Like Cujo, it unnerved me while reading it and parts of it have stuck with me to this day. I think King has never tapped into fear more than in the scene when Louis tries to keep his toddler son, Gage, from running into the road. It unnerved me then and it unnerves me today.
I’m re-reading the book via audiobook and finding that it’s still as intense and riveting as when I first read it. I just got to the sequence in question when Gage dies and it’s still unnerving as all get out. And I’ll admit that part of me finds irony in the fact that a lot of my listening is during runs, pushing Shortcake in her stroller. We run on the sidewalk on a busy road and I’m a bit worried at times when I can see the large percentage of people paying more attention to their cellular devices than watching the road.
In his new introduction to the book, King admits that this novel is one that scares even him and that he wasn’t planning to publish it. But he had to fulfill a contract and so he took it out of his desk drawer and published it.
I’ve seen the original movie version and, quite frankly, it didn’t bother me nearly as much as the novel did. I’m intrigued to see the new movie, even though they made some changes, and see if it can capture the blood-chilling nature of the book. I’ve seen articles that call the book unfilmable and I have to admit part of me thinks this may be true.