Before I discovered Star Trek or Doctor Who, there was Spider-Man. I fell in love with the character from his appearances on the Electric Company and was an avid comic book collector in my younger days with a large portion of my collection devoted to the web-slinger. And during all that time of collecting and loving Spider-Man, I always heard rumors that a movie based on the hero was just around the corner.
Turns out that corner took close to two decades before it was turned, but when it was, I was more than pleased by the results. The original Sam Raimi directedSpider-Man was everything I wanted from a film adaptation of my favorite super-hero and a few years later Spider-Man 2 became the gold standard by which I judge all other comic book movies. Sure Spider-Man 3 was a bit of a letdown, but I’m one of the few who will defend portions of the film and see how it could have been better had the studio stepped back and let Raimi follow his vision for the franchise instead of forcing certain decisions on him and the script.
So, I’ll admit that when it came time to see The Amazing Spider-Man, I was both optimistic and pessimistic about the whole thing. On the one hand, I was eager to see a new cast and crew’s take on my favorite super-hero. On the other hand, I wasn’t exactly eager to experience another origin story movie nor was I certain this set of filmmakers could capture lighting in a bottle again like the Raimi trilogy did.
And that’s the biggest thing working against The Amazing Spider-Man. No matter how you feel about the Raimi films, there will be inevitable comparisons between the two takes on the super hero.
But give director Mark Webb and his star Andrew Garfield a lot of credit–they had some big shoes to fill and, for the most part, they do. While the Raimi films captured the spirit of the Stan Lee/Steve Ditko/John Romita days of Spider-Man, Webb and Garfield channel the vibe of the popular Ultimate Spider-Man comic series that’s been running since the late 90’s.
In Amazing Spider-Man, Parker is still a high school outsider, but he’s got a bit more of an edge to him. A science whiz who skateboards and is a bit of a loner, all while pining for Gwen Stacy, Garfield’s work as Peter is the strongest selling point of the film. It’s nice to see that Garfield and Webb allow Spider-Man to retain his signature witty banter in the film, something that was missing at times in the Raimi version.
Garfield is helped by a strong cast of characters around him, including Martin Sheen as Uncle Ben, Sally Field as Aunt May and Denis Leary as Captain Stacy, but a lot of the movie falls on Garfield’s shoulders and he’s more than up to the task. It helps that he shares some great on-screen chemistry with Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy. Stone also does solid work here and it helps that the script makes Gwen more than just the screaming female victim that Spider-Man has to save throughout the film.
Of course, the first third of the film is tied up with the familiar origin story, though there are a few twists thrown in to keep things feeling fresh. It’s once Peter gets his powers that things pick up a bit. Tying the origin and creation of Spider-Man to that of the Lizard works fairly well and Rhys Ifans gets to chew a lot scenery as Dr. Curt Connors aka the Lizard. It’s nice that the franchise has returned to the focus on one threat to Spider-Man in the film (though there are hints of a larger threat lurking in the background as the movie is clearly working to set up a franchise).
In many ways, this film feels like it could be to the Spider-Man universe what Batman Begins was to the Batman universe. And if that’s the case, I have high hopes for a second installment. (And make sure you stay through the credits because there is a teaser for the next film in there).
However, while I liked Amazing Spider-Man, I still can’t say I loved it the same way I did the original entry. Amazing is so focused on Peter and Gwen that we don’t get much time to really develop some of the colorful supporting characters from the Spidey universe that I came to know and love reading the comics.
It will probably take a second or third viewing of Amazing Spider-Man before I can really say whether I loved it or not. In a summer of high profile comic book movies, it’s not as much movie-going fun as The Avengers and it’s not likely to be as dark as The Dark Knight Rises will be. As a reboot, it has its merits and it’s a nice reset for the franchise.
If you’re wondering whether or not to check out the film in 3-D, I can say it’s hit or miss. The point of view sequences (two short ones) of Spidey using his powers are nicely done and certainly the 3-D doesn’t detract from the film. But I don’t see that it necessarily is essential to enjoy the film or adds a whole lot to the experience. And if you’ve got the IMAX option with the higher ticket price, which is how I saw the film, it’s certainly not essential but it’s nice if you want to pay a bit more for optimum image and sound. Of course, it goes without saying that an IMAXed Emma Stone is a good thing, but that’s more a personal preference based on my fan-boy crush on Stone.