The combination of the classic series’ best writer (Robert Holmes) with the arguably the Target novels’ best writer (Ian Marter) makes  a winning combination for a  television adaptation. Add in that “The Ribos Operation” is an underrated script by Holmes and you’ve got the potential for something really special.

Marter’s adaptation of the script tells the same story without necessarily being a play-by-play rehash of what appears on screens. Certain scenes are shifted for sake of the narrative flow but for the most part it’s the same story you’ve seen on TV, VHS or DVD. A strong script full of solid double acts and well crafted characters is enhanced and expanded by Marter with great success. Marter is able to make certain monsters a lot more threatening once freed of the TV budget limitations. He’s also able to insert a bit more brutality into the deaths that take place during the fourth episode of the show.

Easily one of the better offerings from the Target range.

As for the audio reading, John Leeson acquits himself fairly well. Of course, his K9 is spot-on, but he does a decent job mimicking Tom Baker and Mary Tamm as the Doctor and Romana in the story.

View all my reviews

A cover blurb on another Dirk Pitt novel compares the hero of Clive Cussler’s novels to James Bond. The comparison is an apt one, especially when it comes to the first two novels in the series, The Mediterranean Caper and Iceberg.

In the same way that Fleming used Bond as a way to comment on the ways in which masculinity could and should be defined, Cussler defines what is masculine through the opinions, actions and attitudes of one Dirk Pitt. For example, in Caper, Pitt meets a women who has been mourning the passing of her husband for a number of years and decides the thing she needs to help her get over his death is to find someone new to make love to. Within moments, Pitt and the woman are having a little sex on the beach (not the alcoholic kind mind you) and the woman is soon totally over her depression and grief and now devoted to Pitt. (In many ways, the scene reminds me of the “cure” put forward in Kevin Smith’s Chasing Amy. If you’ve seen it, you’ll know what I’m talking about).

But the attitude doesn’t just extend to women. Pitt is the alpha male of alpha males in the novel, including wandering around naked at one point while being debriefed by his superior officer. Pitt is also one of the few people in the world to ever navigate his way out of a deadly maze trap, all while wounded and losing blood.

In many ways, Pitt is Jack Bauer and Chuck Norris of his day and age. He lives hard, loves hard and gets the job done. Like Bond or Bauer, Pitt is generally right about his assumptions, while others higher up in authority are wrong. And he’s not afraid to say it or act on his assumptions.

These thoughts occurred to at about the mid-point of Caper and they really helped me to not worry so much about the details of the story and just go along for the ride. I doubt any one will mistake this book for fine literature but as a popcorn, escapist thriller, it’s kind of a fun ride and it certainly does keep the pages turning. Pitt is called in to investigate an aerial attack on a local airbase from a World War II era plane. Is it a ghost come back or could the timing of the attack be tied into the discovery of a wreck just off the coast? Pitt soon finds himself facing a hiding Nazi war criminal, who just happens to be the uncle to his new female love interest. It’s a battle of wits and a race against time for the two.

Again, the less you think about the story and just kind of let it wash over you like a big-budget Hollywood thriller, the happier you’ll probably be. It’s interesting to read the novel thirty plus years after its initial publication and to take note of the multiple references to smoking that litter the novel. Moving forward it will be interesting to see if and how Pitt’s (and to the same extent Cussler’s)attitude toward the use of tobacco changes. I can’t imagine that Pitt would be the smoker in the latest installments that he is here.

So turn the brain off and just enjoy. You may be glad you did.

View all my reviews

I’ve decided to take part in Mixing It Up Challenge for 2012.  Still not sure what level of participation I may undertake during the coming year.  But here’s the list of what I’ve read as part of the challenge.

I’ll also include a link to my review of each book, both on the site and on GoodReads.

Classic: 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea by Jules Verne 

While 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea is one of the more familiar titles in literature, I have to admit my familiarity with it comes less from the literary work of Jules Verne and more from the big-screen adaptation by Walt Disney. (And to some lesser extent, the now defunct ride at both American Disney theme parks). Growing up, the film’s climatic battle with the squid was featured on numerous Wonderful World of Disney clips show.

So when I sat down this time to read the original novel, I had to push aside memories of the Disney film and really try and focus on original novel as written so many years ago by Verne.

Having waded through the novel, I have to admit that in some ways the movie is better. Or to be more exact–my memories of the film are better. (I haven’t had time to revisit the film yet, so it should be interesting to see if it can compete with the memories and impressions I have of it.) Like The Lord of the Rings saga, the story works a lot better in a visual medium. Once our intrepid heroes find their way on board the Nautilus a lot of the story becomes about exacting detail of how far we’ve traveled and the wonders under the sea. At first, it’s interesting but like the epic quest in Tolkein, it starts to wear a bit thin after a dozen or so pages and you start asking yourself–could something, anything maybe start happening, please?!? Even the battle with the undersea creature is a lot more thrilling in the movie, if only because it’s given a bit more time to breath on the big-screen. In the original novel, it’s relatively short compared to the overall exploration of underwater world and the marvelous creation of Captain Nemo.

Honestly, I found the search for Nautilus and the mystery surrounding it before its big reveal to be a far more compelling and interesting story than much of what happens once we actually get on board the vessel. The cat and mouse chase to try and find the ship makes for some compelling reading early on and there were times as I waded through the last third of the novel I wished Verne had kept that same urgency and intensity in the overall book.

Reading the novel, I had to keep reminding myself that books are a product of their era. I kept trying to put myself into the mind of a reader when the original novel was first published. And I can see how some of what Verne describes and crates could inspire awe and wonder within a reader. And perhaps given the greater emphasis put on character creation in the more modern era when it come to genre literature, I had different expectations than those readers who originally picked up the novel when it was first published.

I don’t mean to say that the novel wasn’t a good one nor a necessarily enjoyable experience. It’s just one of those cases where it’s hard to separate the novel from the many interpretations that have come along since it was first published.

View all my reviews

I think 2012 needs a good challenge or two to keep things interesting.  And while I’ve challenged myself on the total number of books I’ll read this year, I haven’t had a challenge yet on the variety of books to read this year.

Enter this challenge, issued by Musings of a Bookshop Girl.   It’s the Mix It Up Challenge and you can find out details HERE. 

I’m going to shoot for the Mixing Bowl level and see how things go.  I can always bump up the challenge level later, right?

So, who’s with me?

I saw this article the other day that asked, “Are you ashamed of skipping parts of books?” Which, naturally, made me want to ask all of YOU.

Do you skip ahead in a book? Do you feel badly about it when you do?

Since I’m not in school any more and am not being quizzed on the books I read or having to write essays on them, I don’t feel too bad if I skip ahead from time to time. I try to avoid it, but there are times when there’s something I’m reading that I have enough of an investment in to want to know how it turns out but not enough patience to plow through the book (this is especially the case if the book is boring me). This happens a lot of times with mysteries, especially if I happen to deduce the ending before the characters in the book do.

Also, I recall the study that came out last year that said no matter how hard we try, we will never read all the books out there or see all the movies or TV shows out there.  Simply not enough time.  So why not skip or find SPOILERS every once in a while?

*Well, at least his carefully crafted comic character persona did. 

Looking back on the past thirty-eight years, I can see how amazingly blessed I am.   Even just casting my memory back over the past year, it’s been a great one.  I got to take a trip to Disney World with my family, married my best friend, completed my third indoor triathlon and half-marathon (actually, ran half a mile longer, but who’s counting?!?), welcomed the arrival of a new niece and much, much more.  Oh sure, last year was arguably the worst year in the history of Tennessee athletics but that can only mean that the foundation is in place for my thirty-ninth year to be memorable for good reasons.**

**It wasn’t helped by that pathetic display of basketball I witnessed last evening when the Vols played UGA.  I must be a true orange and white fan to endure THAT! 

During the year, I read a lot of books, watched a lot of TV and televised sports, saw some movies and listened to some music.   As for what is ahead in my thirty-ninth year, I can only say I’m looking forward to what’s in store.

And since forty is the new thirty, I may not be like Jack Benny and actually keep counting my birthdays from this point forward.  Or maybe not.  Time will tell.

But enough about interviewing other people. It’s time I interviewed YOU.

1. What’s your favorite time of day to read?

Any time I can find a few minutes to read is good by me, though I will admit I enjoy winding down after a long day with a chapter or two in bed.

2. Do you read during breakfast? (Assuming you eat breakfast.)

I generally watch local news to find out how good or bad traffic will be and SportsCenter.

3. What’s your favorite breakfast food? (Noting that breakfast foods can be eaten any time of day.)

Bacon.  Seriously, it’s the perfect food.

4. How many hours a day would you say you read?

One to two.

5. Do you read more or less now than you did, say, 10 years ago?

More

6. Do you consider yourself a speed reader?

Yes, I can read fairly rapidly.

7. If you could have any superpower, what would it be?

Spider-sense to warn me when I’m about to do something dumb.

8. Do you carry a book with you everywhere you go?

Of course.

9. What KIND of book?

Well, with my Kindle app on my phone, I have a wide variety that go with me everywhere.   As for a physical book, it’s usually a paperback or library copy of whatever I’m reading.  I tend to read a couple of books at time.

10. How old were you when you got your first library card?

I am not sure.  Probably as soon as I was old enough to get one.

11. What’s the oldest book you have in your collection? (Oldest physical copy? Longest in the collection? Oldest copyright?)

A family bible that was my grandparents’.

12. Do you read in bed?

See question one.

13. Do you write in your books?

No!

14. If you had one piece of advice to a new reader, what would it be?

Pick something to read that interests you.  Don’t be concerned with what other people deem as a “good” book or even a classic. If you’re not enjoying the book, you won’t read it.  Also, don’t be afraid to try something new or different.

15. What question have I NOT asked at BTT that you’d love me to ask? 

Hmmmmmm, let me ponder that one.

While Star Trek fans may never agree on which series is the best (it will always be Original Series, hands down), most fans will agree that Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan is the best entry in the long-running film franchise. In fact, were it not for Khan and it’s success, it’s likely we’d only have the original 79 episodes and a couple of movies to discuss when it comes to one of the greatest franchises in modern entertainment history.

A lot of ink has been spilled in recent years on the “kiss and tell” behind the scenes looks at the making of Star Trek. This time the behind the scenes look comes from director Nicholas Meyer, who admits that he had very little familiarity with Star Trek before he took on the task of crafting the story for Khan and serving as director for the second installment. And yet it’s Meyer, along with Harve Bennett, who arguably have had the biggest impact on the Trek franchise outside of Gene Roddenberry himself and the oft-overlooked classic Trek producer Gene Coon.

The View from the Bridge offers a look at Meyer’s life and career pre and post Trek and it’s every bit as interesting as you’d hope it would be. It’s also refreshingly honest from Meyer, who admits that all he ever wanted to do is grow up to write the kind of stories he liked. Meyer examines his career with honesty and little self-delusion. He is quick to point out things he believes he did right, but also to call himself for shortcomings or mistakes made along the way. (Most telling are a few comments about how Roddenberry was treated by the time Meyer assumed the director’s seat for the sixth installment in the franchise).

If you’re a Trek fan like I am, you’re likely to eat this up with a spoon. But this memoir holds more than just the standard look at the franchise or serving as another kiss and tell book. Reading it made me want to re-visit much, if not all of, Meyer’s output over the years to examine them again after seeing this inside look. I will admit I’ve never been a huge fan of his Holmes pastiche The Seven Percent Solution but after reading this book, I’m curious to look at it again, taking into account the behind-the-scenes information Meyer details here. And, of course, after reading this book, I want to dust off my oft-watched copy of Wrath of Khan and view it again.

View all my reviews

Theories concerning the assignation of President John F. Kennedy seemed to hit a watershed moment when I was in college–or maybe it just seemed that way because for one semester for an English literature class, we read Don DeLillo’s Libra as well as re-visiting Oliver Stone’s JKF. Toss in the Quantum Leap episode, “Lee Harvey Oswald” and you’ve got a lot of conspiracy theories running competing for time and attention.

So when I heard that Stephen King’s latest novel was going to center around the assignation of JFK, I have to admit a part of my deep down inside groaned a bit. Oh sure, enough time has passed since that time of feeling like I was immersed in JFK theories and I still enjoy the JFK parody on Seinfeld‘s classic episode, “The Boyfriend,” but I wasn’t quite sure I was ready to leap back into more JFK conspiracy theories and stories.

Eight hundred or so pages later, I realize that I should probably have a bit more faith in Stephen King. Yes, 11/22/63 concerns the JFK assignation, but King has crafted something more in his latest novel. Continuing his career renaissance, King has crafted a time travel novel that is fascinating, compelling and human. Divorced school teacher Jake Epping is presented with an opportunity to travel back in time and to change history. A friend shows him a one-way door to the past that Jake can travel from current day back to 1957. King wisely limits his time travel conceit to travel to only one point in history at each side of the corridor. And changes must be made each time you travel back in time or else history “resets.” No time for sight-seeing along the way and having Jake arrive each time at a point several years from when the assignation occurs means there’s no use of re-dos or going back to correct previous mistakes without dramatic personal consequences for the traveler in question.

At first, Jake makes a small change to history, helping a student whose father abused him and destroyed his family. During this trip, Jake learns how hard history will work to ensure that changes aren’t made on any major scale (the first traveler uses the corridor to purchase hamburger at 50′s prices for his diner before deciding to try and stop the JFK assignation). Jake makes the change and then decides it’s time to go all in and make some major history altering changes.

At close to 900 pages, 11/22/63 is quite a tome for Stephen King. Jake’s time in the past is detailed as he settles in, creating a life for himself as he waits and readies for that fateful day. In many ways, the details of Jake’s creating a life in the past, falling in love with a divorced fellow teacher and his small town life is just as compelling, if not more so, than the plot about trying to see if Oswald worked alone or if there was a larger conspiracy. And while you could argue that the entire establishing a life is a huge side step for the novel, I wouldn’t trade one bit of it to make this novel any shorter.

King knows what’s he’s doing with this enjoyable, compelling and compulsively readable novel. Don’t worry about a page count or getting lost in the subplots. It’s all worth it in the end. One of the most enjoyable novels I read in 2011.

View all my reviews