Booking Through Thursday

btt button

In a related question to last week’s–

I was reading the other day a quote from JFK Jr who said on the death of his mother, that she died surrounded by family, friends, and her books. Apparently, Jackie’s books were very much a part of HER, her personality, her sense of self.

Up until recently, people could browse your bookshelves and learn a lot about you–what your interests are, your range of topics, favorite authors, how much you read (or at least buy books).

More and more, though, this is changing. People aren’t buying books so much as borrowing them from the library. Or reading them on their e-readers or computers. There’s nothing PHYSICAL on the shelves to tell strangers in your home, for better or worse, who you ARE.

Do you think this is a good thing? Bad? Discuss!

While I’m intrigued by an e-book reader and the ease and convenience of carrying around an entire library of books in something as light and easy to carry as they are, there’s still part of me that’s old fashioned and wants to have the tactile experience of turning pages and feeling the weight of a book on my hands while reading.

I do think e-readers can help in some ways with covers.  For example, when I was in high school I picked up Robert A. Heinlein’s To Sail Beyond the Sunset.  At the time, it had a cover that featured his main character, a sexy redheaded female, with her long flowing hair strategically covering certain portions of her.   It’s not a book I’d necessarily feel comfortable reading in public with the cover.  So an e-book reader could help me to be able to read it or any other book without being judged by the cover as it were.

But I still think there’s a place for physical copies of books–either to display on a shelf as our favorites or just to have because we’ve read and liked them.  One thing I’ve said when asked about e-book readers is that books never run out of batteries.  And a physical book may more easily fall open to a favorite section, chapter or passage.

As for not owning as many books, I can see that argument.  I use my local library a lot.  And I don’t apologize for it.  I don’t necessarily want to buy every book I want to read.   (Also, I couldn’t afford to do that and still eat on a regular basis or have a home in which to have bookshelves to display said books).  Also, libraries can keep copies of older books that may go out of print on hand so that future readers can enjoy them.

3 Comments

Filed under Booking Through Thursday, meme

3 responses to “Booking Through Thursday

  1. I am a book buyer, I used to use the library way more when I was younger now I just feel the need to own books because I am huge re-reader. I definitel prefer to read real life book but I do love my kindle too.
    Sally.
    http://theelifylop.blogspot.com/2011/04/booking-through-thursday-13.html

  2. I still prefer the actual book.

    stop and see mine and my giveaways.

  3. It is too bad that an e-reader, which is deemed more of a personal item, doesn’t volunteer information like bookcases do. But if you think of it the other way, how often do you get invited to an acquaintance’s house, let alone spending time sizing up the book collection? I do have an interesting encounter at the coffee shop, where a stranger asked what I was reading, which, at the moment, was Anita Brookner’s Fraud. On another occasion, reading from my iPad only invited curious eyes and a bevy of questions on the gadget’s specifications. No interest in what I was reading. To make a long story short, I like to be known as a reader of real books, not of electronic device.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s